Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 15:34:15 -0400
From: Nick Totton <100532.2353@compuserve.com>
To: orgonomy <orgonomy@mail.webcom.com>
Subject: accumulators
Sender: owner-orgonomy@webcom.com

Chris,

you write

<I'm wondering if you could tell us more about your experiments.   How did 
you come to try the powdered quartz / cotton model?  Is it actually 
resistant to DOR?  Have you tried putting an electric coil in this model 
and testing if it generates DOR?  Or does it also accumulate less orgone?  A 
model that was a more powerful accumulator but was resistant to DOR would 
have very important implications for Orgone Energy Physics.>

I got the idea of this combination of materials from Gurudas' book on Flower
Essences - it's 'channelled' information, which for me gives it exactly the same
status as anyone else's bright idea. But it seemed worth trying to me, because 

a)'certain sets of two different materials' seems to be as precise as we can be
about orgone generation so far.

b)many prehistoric sites which undoubtedly generate orgone seem to use
quartz-bearing rock.

c)what the hell!

I had to experiment because I couldn't obtain the precuse ingerdients given, but
using sodium silicate to bind the powdered quartx seemed to make sense, as it's
simply another form of the same stuff.

My conclusion that it soaks up less DOR is empirical/subjective: you can leave
the things around in an ordinary household day after day, and they never seem to
need cleaning out. This is _not_ my experience of metallic accumulators! However
they're definitely less powerful than metallic versions, up to about seven
layers anyway: very gentle, friendly, healing energy, nice to have around.

Hope this helps

regards

Nick Totton
100532.2353'compuserve

Web Hosting · Blog · Guestbooks · Message Forums · Mailing Lists
Allwebco Web Templates · Build your own toolbar · Free Talking Character · Audio, Fonts, Clipart
powered by bravenet.com