|
|
OML Archives-
Subject: Re: Relevant text - Fri, 22 Dec 1995 22:51:18 -0500
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 22:51:18 -0500
From: ToddT8@aol.com
To: orgonomy@jefferson.village.virginia.edu
Subject: Re: Relevant text
Sender: owner-orgonomy@jefferson.village.virginia.edu
In a message dated 95-12-21 11:57:18 EST, you write:
>I agree about what is the point about tooth fairies etc ??? and what is the
>correlation to Reich. I don't feel that there has been any religous
>indications by any of the writing I have seen here on the OML. Reich was flawed as are
>we all. He smoked a lot at times and Im sure some experiments will bear out
>some new insights that he didn't have concerning orgonomy but that is what
>true science is allabout. Its learning as one traverses new territory. He
>was humble enough to realize this as well.
I apologize if I offended anyone. Let me clarify my post. My first point
was that I don't believe that subjective reality translates into some sort of
objective reality as I felt was implied by the text I highlighted.
My second point was that I felt that in all this slagging of Carl Sagan (who
may or may not deserve it) that people were quoting Reich in the same way as
religious zealots would quote the bible. I get frightened when I see this
and statements like yours reassure me.
Thanks for your understanding.
Todd
--- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Many thanks for Geocities providing this free
space
Get your own Free Home Page
bravenet.com