|
|
|
|
OML Archives-
Subject: Re: Relevant text - Sat, 23 Dec 1995 21:20:33 -0500
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 1995 21:20:33 -0500
From: ToddT8@aol.com
To: orgonomy@jefferson.village.virginia.edu
Subject: Re: Relevant text
Sender: owner-orgonomy@jefferson.village.virginia.edu
In a message dated 95-12-23 13:06:37 EST, you write:
>Todd,
>
>I think you just conflated two seperate threads. One was on Sagan, the other
>was
>on visible orgone units. Kenn was describing his perceptions of that. It had
>nothing to do with the Sagan thing. I could see how that would look weird
>viewed
>chronologically, rather than in context.
>
>-Jim Martin
>
>
Whoa, I didn't mean to cause such a stir here. I have been lurking for a
while and felt that there were some things posted that needed some
counterbalance. I have a habit of playing 'devil's advocate' in a kind of
Marxian dialectic way. I think the discussion is more productive when not
everyone is in agreement. As I mentioned in a previous post, I get very
nervous when I hear only one side of the argument. I'm not saying that's
what's going on here, but sometimes I get the same vibe from some posts as I
do from the born again types. Let me again say that Reich has been a major
influence in my life and I believe that orgonomy has a great potential to
'free' many people. I appreciate the opportunity to have disagreement here.
Peace,
Todd
--- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Many thanks for Geocities providing this free
space
Get your own Free Home Page
bravenet.com