|
|
|
|
OML Archives-
Subject: Re: pgp or whatever - Sun, 21 Jan 1996 22:30:14 -0500
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 1996 22:30:14 -0500
To: orgonomy@jefferson.village.virginia.edu
From: Kenn Thomas <skthoma@umslvma.umsl.edu>
Subject: Re: pgp or whatever
Sender: owner-orgonomy@jefferson.village.virginia.edu
>We can all drop our paranoia and share what we know , learn and research for
>all to learn...
If I wasn't convinced that spies can un-encrypt better than ordinary people
can encrypt, I would be pro-PGP. Reich was open and honest about his work
and look where it got him. Who knows what They can do with OML
communications? Brand them as labeling for orgone boxes and kick OML off the
Internet?
It's not paranoia, but rational caution: after "obscenity" is exhausted as
an excuse to censor the Internet, they may come after "quack medicine" or
some such, and OML may yet become a target.
Still, PGP does not seem to be the answer...
kt
Kenn Thomas
--- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Many thanks for Geocities providing this free space
Get your own Free Home Page
bravenet.com