untitled
  • Hey Webmasters! New Photo Album Service Launched - Check it out!

OML Archives- 
 Subject: Court records WR vs USA - Sat, 27 Jan 1996 10:55:18 -0500


Date: Sat, 27 Jan 1996 10:55:18 -0500
From: pore@mainelink.net
Subject: Court records WR vs USA
To: orgonomy@jefferson.village.virginia.edu
Sender: owner-orgonomy@jefferson.village.virginia.edu


OML

I also do not have have the the inintial injunction or the transcript of 
the trial of May 3-7, 1956. The WRM was selling the  wr's response 
(separate); and the transcript of the trial May 3-7,1956 for 36.50. The 
court copying would cost well over 300 hundred at a dollar a page.(its 
over 300 pages).

The chat on OML doesn't make total sense about Boston holding these records 
as I found them in Portland Federal court which is under jurisdiction of 
Boston. The trial was in PORTLAND, MAINE... Maybe they have copies as well.


WR trial transcripts are located in Portland Maine Fed Court. The trail 
transcripts were dated as follows:

1. Oct 18, 1955 "motions and arraignments" 35 pages; 
2. Nov 4, 1955 "hearing and decisions on motions" 48 pages. I don't have 
copies of them due to cost of copying them but had made these notes from 
the files at the Portland court back in 1975 when I read the Jerome 
Greenfield book "WR vs USA". That is where I have this info from. I think 
the courts wanted a dollar per copy. Honoable judge John Clifford presided 
over these trials. 

3. May 3,4,5, and 7, 1956 "Information and Application in Criminal 
Contempt"  about 315 pages . This was presided over by the Honorable Judge 
George Sweeney with  a jury impaneled.


I would say more research into what other documents are available should be 
done but I shall have to wait until a vaction when I can get to the court 
to check what is there during their reg hours. Portland is about 20-30 
minutes a way from where I live. It would be great to put the legal court 
documents up for all to have and read. I have always felt that it is better 
to read the source than to listen to others interpretations. Just take 
todays news for example : the news bites on tv hardly tell the whole story 
in any news report. Eight hours of a trial put on a 10 minute news report 
tells the public very little concerning what went on in a trial. 


A truly long task would be to put these on the web ; and the final decree 
and last court appeals initiated by Reich. Maybe also the transcript of Eva 
vs WRITF in 1975---etc. I don't have the Eva Reich vs WRITF  transcripts 
from 70s and 80s either but they should be located in Farmington, Maine 
court house. Anyone out there who would like to help transcribe into 
email or file please do so. I will be glad to put the trancripts on the web 
for all.
I'm a slow typist. A person with a scanner or fast typers who have this 
material to work from would be doing a service to all the world to see. The 
transcripts are public property for all. After all it is the public that 
pays for the transcripts and salaries of the prosecution and judge.
 
                                        .......Jogg


     --- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---



Many thanks for Geocities providing this free space
Get your own Free Home Page


Web Hosting · Blog · Guestbooks · Message Forums · Mailing Lists
Allwebco Web Templates · Build your own toolbar · Free Talking Character · Audio, Fonts, Clipart
powered by a free webtools company bravenet.com