|
|
OML Archives-
Subject: Re: orgonomy - Wed, 14 Feb 1996 10:00:21 -0500
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 10:00:21 -0500
From: Christopher G Caruso <ccaruso@sas.upenn.edu>
Subject: Re: orgonomy
To: orgonomy@jefferson.village.virginia.edu
Sender: owner-orgonomy@jefferson.village.virginia.edu
Shawn P. Wilbur wrote:
> it is hard not to ask *why* - to what end - this
> message has been posted in this forum and in this form. It is clear that
> it has little potential to educate or build the community we are
> attempting to build through forums like this one - *But* does have
> considerable potential for causing disruption. Apparently the stated
> concern for ecology does not extend to the fragile ecologies developing on
> the net. The essay is clearly a bomb dropped for maximum effect. This
> hardly seems consistent with the life-affirming character of reichian
> work.
This is quite an outlandish metaphor. The "disruption" supposedly caused
by an e-mail message is akin to environmental carnage? That's pretty
absurd.
As another poster pointed out, you are guilty of the very things you
accuse Carlinsky of, Shawn. Namely, virulent attacks on people's
character, rather than discussing the issues at hand.
If Carlinsky is wrong, let him be disproven. Open debate of different
points of view on orgonomy is the whole point of this list. Let's stop the
ad hominem attacks and stick to discussing the issues in a rational manner.
I look forward to Dr. DeMeo's reply, as well as the reply from PORE.
--
Chris Caruso Check out: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~ccaruso/
ccaruso@sas.upenn.edu http://www.igc.org/fair/
Philadelphia, PA USA http://www.mcs.com/~jdav/league.html
--- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Many thanks for Geocities providing this free space
Get your own Free Home Page
bravenet.com