|
|
OML Archives-
Subject: Re: orgonomy - Wed, 14 Feb 1996 17:56:05 -0500
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 17:56:05 -0500
From: Kenn Thomas <skthoma@umslvma.umsl.edu>
To: orgonomy@jefferson.village.virginia.edu
Subject: Re: orgonomy
Sender: owner-orgonomy@jefferson.village.virginia.edu
>This is quite an outlandish metaphor. The "disruption" supposedly caused
>by an e-mail message is akin to environmental carnage? That's pretty
>absurd.
Important people have left the list just because of the proximity of
Carlinsky. I'm certainly not sticking around to shadow box
Carlinskyisms. Why do you take it so lightly?
>As another poster pointed out, you are guilty of the very things you
>accuse Carlinsky of, Shawn. Namely, virulent attacks on people's
>character, rather than discussing the issues at hand.
How dare you say that whether or not Jim DeMeo has killed people with his
cloudbusting work is an issue. This is swinophilia. We have all been able
to disagree on issues of substance.
kt
>If Carlinsky is wrong, let him be disproven. Open debate of different
>points of view on orgonomy is the whole point of this list. Let's stop the
>ad hominem attacks and stick to discussing the issues in a rational manner.
>
>I look forward to Dr. DeMeo's reply, as well as the reply from PORE.
>
>
>--
>Chris Caruso Check out: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~ccaruso/
>ccaruso@sas.upenn.edu http://www.igc.org/fair/
>Philadelphia, PA USA http://www.mcs.com/~jdav/league.html
>
>
>
> --- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---
--- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Many thanks for Geocities providing this free space
Get your own Free Home Page
bravenet.com