Hey Webmasters! Get a free website with holiday themes - Get it NOW!
|
|
|
OML Archives-
Subject: Re: egos - Mon, 19 Feb 1996 06:16:39 -0500
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 06:16:39 -0500
From: Peggy Bochmann <peggy.bochmann@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
To: orgonomy@jefferson.village.virginia.edu
Subject: Re: egos
Sender: owner-orgonomy@jefferson.village.virginia.edu
EGehrman@eworld.com wrote:
>
>
> I As is often pointed out, almost all major
> scientific breakthroughs, and the persons championing them, are first
> regarded as ridiculous by their contemporaries.
> To hold these renegade views requires a strong ego and folks with strong
> egos have a difficult time accepting other strong egos. That's a fact we
> must begin to deal with. We can't afford to be trashing each other, no
> matter how cleverly it's done. I want Jim, Jim, and Ken back on this mailing
> list. We need them. Maybe they are open to criticism, as we all are, but
> not the sophisticated name calling that passes for analysis which has become
> such a serious drag on our group.
>
This is worth reading again. Thanks for the insight.
Sin-seering-reality,
Chad May
--- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Many thanks for Geocities providing this free space
Get your own Free Home Page
bravenet.com