|
|
|
|
OML Archives-
Subject: Re: Response - Sun, 3 Mar 1996 15:57:39 -0500
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 1996 15:57:39 -0500
From: Risky Descent <prophet@ksu.ksu.edu>
To: orgonomy@jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
Subject: Re: Response
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960303142438.7969C-100000@cbs.ksu.ksu.edu>
Sender: owner-orgonomy@jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
One possible answer to these problems is to split the mailing list into
two or more parts. Some people don't seem interested in some items of
discussion.
For example: We've now seen several messages about what is appropritate
on this list. Why not put all of that discussion in a
"orgonomy-appropriateness" list? None of those messages have much to do
with the subject of the list itself.
>From the peanut gallery,
Jason Hamilton
--- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Many thanks for Geocities providing this free space
Get your own Free Home Page
bravenet.com