Hey Webmasters! New Photo Album Service Launched - Check it out!
|
|
|
OML Archives-
Subject: Re: Clod-Bustin' - Sat, 9 Mar 1996 01:47:27 -0500
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 01:47:27 -0500
From: orgone@shore.net (true paranoia..reads)
Message-Id: <199603090637.BAA04797@relay1.shore.net>
Subject: Re: Clod-Bustin'
To: orgonomy@jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
Sender: owner-orgonomy@jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
Dear Chris,
Your posts are always interesting. Where is the story about Reich by the
lake from?
I agree completely with your suggestion that there is no need to split the
list. The discussion is lively, even unkind at times but we are all adults
and familiar with such. I hope everyone comes back, Kenn Thomas, Jim DeMeo,
anybody else that left. I see that Jim Martin is posting again....great!
I propose that we attempt to create a "Chrono Synclastic Infundibulum" where
"everybody's daddy can be right at the same time" in the words of Kurt
Vonnegut. They only exist on the planet Tralfamador. Seriously, I'm here to
learn and exchange ideas. That includes good ideas, bad ideas, and new
ideas. The only way I can be sure to know which is which is to hear them all.
You said it well;
I'm cautiously optimistic and pretty enthusiastic that there is a forum
>where we can discuss thease issues, and exchange information, even if some of
>the methods of discussion get a little personal and extreme at times. It would
>be a pity to split-up the discussion into another mailing list when there are
>really just a few of us discussing Orgonomy. Every mailing list I have
>personally
>been on has periods of, ah, lets say unflattering behaviour. It gets
frustrating
>at times, and personalities do clash, but I for one feel it's necessary to
>place the discussion first and my ego second or third <hey, i'm a product of
>my age, i am certainly not above fits of EP> in order to facilitate discussion.
> Wish i had a dime for every email i've frantically typed out in a fit
>of rage, and later deleted or rewrote after I cooled down and became more
>aware of my deeper and sainer intentions. Do we want to be unified in our
>sharing of data and discussion of the Orgone ? To me it's more interesting
>to have an occasional flurry of expressive messages than a sterile and
>predictable void. The personalities involved are secondary to the
>discussion, to me anyway.
end quote.
with love for this list - dave huisken
--- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Many thanks for Geocities providing this free space
Get your own Free Home Page
bravenet.com