|
|
OML Archives-
Subject: Re: Reich and Marx - Tue, 12 Mar 1996 16:38:56 -0500
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 16:38:56 -0500
From: Alan Pogrebinschi <alanpog@ax.apc.org>
Message-ID: <3147345C.7A3D@ax.apc.org>
To: orgonomy@jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
Subject: Re: Reich and Marx
Sender: owner-orgonomy@jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU
Dear OML users,
So much nonsense going on the list, I'm happy someone raised a true
subject, like the Marx-Reich relationship.
Karl Marx was, with Freud, a determinant influence in Reich's work. But
modern reichians, neo-reichians and alike, usually utterly ignore the
theory of marxism.
In my view, one of the sources wich will bring reichian theory back to
life is the reinterpretation of its economical/political consequences.
That's part of my work now.
Let's polemize (is it spelled correct? I'm brazilian - sorry):
- Liberalism, as Adam Smith's, trusts totally in the market's natural
ability to rule itself, for me he was the true founder of
self-regulation. We cannot trust self-regulation on the individual level
and distrust it when it concerns society. I don't mean the market
functions harmoniouslly and fairly now, but humans also are not behaving
healthy at all and we still believe in their natural self-regulation. As
an armored human animal, the market is also armored and depends on the
quality of the people composing it.
I know the above thought leaves many question unanswered. But it was my
starting point, a few years ago. I'm happy to share it with you now.
A good resource on Marx and Engels(another great guy):
http://csf.colorado.edu/psn/marx/
They have many books digitalized - copyrights also die one day!
Love,
Alan Pogrebinschi
--- from list orgonomy@lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Many thanks for Geocities providing this free space
Get your own Free Home Page
bravenet.com